Beyond Monitoring: How Sealos Autonomously Optimizes Your Cloud Spend
Sealos goes beyond traditional monitoring to autonomously optimize cloud spend, turning insights into automatic cost savings. Learn how proactive governance, real-time optimization, and intelligent recommendations streamline cloud economics.
Cloud cost “visibility” isn’t enough anymore. Dashboards and static reports tell you where the money went, but they don’t stop waste, prevent drift, or adapt to real-time demand. What teams need is a platform that measures, decides, and acts—continuously—without turning every engineer into a FinOps specialist.
Enter Sealos. Built as a Cloud OS on top of Kubernetes, Sealos goes beyond monitoring by enabling autonomous, policy-driven optimization. It turns observability and cost insights into automated actions: scaling the right workloads up or down, avoiding overprovisioning, bin-packing resources efficiently, and leveraging cheaper capacity when it’s safe to do so.
In this article, you’ll learn what “autonomous optimization” means in practice on Sealos, why it matters, how it works from the ground up, and actionable playbooks you can implement today. Whether you’re just starting a FinOps program or tuning a multi-tenant platform at scale, you’ll find practical examples and code you can apply.
What Is Sealos, and Why It’s Different
Sealos (sealos.io) is a Cloud Operating System that brings together Kubernetes, multi-tenancy, policy, and application workflows in a cohesive, developer-friendly platform. Instead of stitching together a dozen tools, you get:
- Multi-tenant isolation with namespaces, quotas, and guardrails
- Application lifecycle management with one-click deploys and automation
- Native autoscaling and event-driven scaling capabilities
- A foundation for cost governance and optimization, powered by Kubernetes controllers and policies
Sealos is not just a dashboard; it’s a system that continuously reconciles your desired state with the actual state—across performance, reliability, and cost.
Why Cost Optimization Needs Autonomy
Your cloud bill is the sum of millions of micro-decisions: replica counts, CPU/memory requests, data retention, network egress, placement on spot vs. on-demand nodes, and more. Humans can’t keep up. Even with great reports, manual remediation is:
- Slow: Engineers have to triage and act, often after waste has already accumulated.
- Risky: Ad hoc changes can break SLAs or increase incident risk.
- Incomplete: Optimization is uneven; wins in one area are offset by regressions elsewhere.
Autonomy solves this by:
- Acting in close loop: Measure → Decide → Act → Verify → Iterate.
- Enforcing policy: Guardrails ensure changes respect SLOs and reliability constraints.
- Learning over time: Recommendations and actions improve as usage patterns evolve.
With Sealos, this autonomous loop is grounded in Kubernetes primitives, controllers, and policies that are transparent and auditable.
From Monitoring to Autonomous Optimization
Think of cloud optimization on a spectrum:
- Monitor: You visualize spend and utilization.
- Recommend: You get right-sizing and idle resource suggestions.
- Automate: The platform safely executes approved actions per policy.
- Optimize: It continuously balances performance, reliability, and cost with minimal human intervention.
Sealos is designed to help you move up that spectrum. It integrates the observability you already have with the controllers you need to translate insight into action.
How Sealos Orchestrates Cost Optimization
At a high level, Sealos implements a closed-loop control system using:
- Telemetry: Prometheus metrics, Kubernetes resource usage, billing data, and workload metadata (labels/annotations).
- Policies: Kubernetes LimitRanges, ResourceQuotas, PodDisruptionBudgets (PDBs), and optional OPA/Gatekeeper policies.
- Controllers: Native Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA), Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA), Cluster Autoscaler, and KEDA for event-driven scaling.
- Schedulers and Node Pools: Affinity/anti-affinity, taints/tolerations, and spot vs. on-demand placement rules.
- Lifecycle Automation: Scale-to-zero patterns, storage lifecycle policies, and scheduled capacity changes.
This architecture lets Sealos enforce “desired cost behaviors” without sacrificing SLA/SLO commitments.
The Core Optimization Levers (and How to Implement Them)
Below is a concise map of optimization levers and corresponding tools you can use on Sealos.
Lever | What it does | Kubernetes/Sealos tools | Autonomy level |
---|---|---|---|
Rightsizing | Correct CPU/memory requests/limits | VPA, LimitRange | Automated (guardrailed) |
Elastic scaling | Match replicas to real demand | HPA, KEDA | Automated |
Cluster elasticity | Add/remove nodes as needed | Cluster Autoscaler | Automated |
Cheaper capacity | Use spot/preemptible nodes safely | Node pools, taints/tolerations | Policy-driven automated |
Bin-packing | Consolidate Pods to free nodes | Scheduler hints, PDBs | Automated with constraints |
Scale-to-zero | Stop dev/test or idle services | KEDA Cron, controllers | Automated/scheduled |
Storage lifecycle | Move/expire cold data | S3 lifecycle policies | Automated |
Network hygiene | Reduce egress/cross-zone costs | Affinity, service mesh policy | Policy-driven |
Let’s walk through practical examples.
1) Right-Size Pods Automatically with VPA
Overprovisioned requests waste money; underprovisioned limits cause throttling and incidents. Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) learns from usage and updates requests/limits to the right levels.
Example VPA (set safely with min/max bounds):
- Best practice: Start with updateMode: “Off” (recommendation-only), apply bounds, then switch to “Auto”.
- Use LimitRange per namespace to set sensible defaults and maximums.
2) Elastic Replicas with HPA (Resource-Based)
Match replicas to CPU or memory utilization using the v2 HPA API:
- Tips:
- Keep a safety floor via minReplicas.
- Combine with PDBs to avoid cascading restarts during scale-down.
3) Event-Driven Scaling with KEDA (Queues, Schedules, APIs)
For background workers, batch jobs, or anything triggered by external signals (Kafka lag, RabbitMQ depth, HTTP rate), KEDA gives you precise control. You can also use KEDA to scale-to-zero outside business hours.
Example: Scale to 3 replicas during work hours, down to 0 off-hours:
Example: Scale a worker from 0..30 based on Kafka consumer lag:
4) Cluster Autoscaler for Node-Level Savings
Cluster Autoscaler grows/shrinks your node pools to fit your Pods. It’s the muscle that turns Pod-level efficiency into real money. Configure it to scale down quickly when nodes go idle, while respecting Pod disruption protections.
Key flags to consider (values depend on your workload):
- --balance-similar-node-groups
- --expander=least-waste
- --scale-down-unneeded-time=10m
- --scale-down-utilization-threshold=0.5
On Sealos, you run the autoscaler the same way you would on any Kubernetes cluster, tuned to your underlying infrastructure provider.
5) Safe Spot/Preemptible Usage with Affinity and Taints
Spot instances can cut compute costs by 60–90% but bring interruption risk. The pattern is to schedule fault-tolerant workloads on a tainted “spot” pool and keep critical services on on-demand nodes.
Pod spec for spot-friendly workers:
Add a PDB and ensure your app tolerates replays/retries. For transactional systems, stick with on-demand capacity.
6) Bin-Packing Without Breaking Resilience
Efficient bin-packing frees entire nodes to be scaled down. Guide the scheduler while maintaining availability:
- Use soft preferredDuringScheduling rules to co-locate tolerable Pods.
- Use topology spread constraints to avoid single-node risk.
- Define PDBs so the autoscaler doesn’t evict too aggressively.
Example topology spread:
7) Scale-to-Zero for Non-Prod and On-Demand Services
Beyond the KEDA cron pattern, you can scale seldom-used services to zero by default, then wake them on demand via:
- Ingress-based activators (e.g., using an event gateway)
- Job-based workloads triggered by CI/CD
- Developer self-service buttons in Sealos Workspace
This removes whole classes of idle spend (dev sandboxes, QA stacks, nightly tools).
8) Storage Lifecycle Automation
Storage is a cost sink if you never expire or tier data. Apply S3-compatible lifecycle policies to transition objects to cheaper tiers or delete them after a retention window.
Example lifecycle JSON (applies to many S3-compatible systems):
On Sealos, you can deploy an S3-compatible service via the app marketplace and enforce lifecycle policies at bucket creation time.
Governance and Guardrails: Optimize Without Surprises
Autonomous optimization only works if it respects constraints. Sealos makes it straightforward to encode guardrails so the platform never chases savings at the expense of reliability.
- ResourceQuotas per namespace: Prevents runaway consumption.
- OPA/Gatekeeper policies: Enforce that all Deployments set requests/limits, or that production Pods cannot run on spot nodes.
- PDBs and MinAvailable: Maintain service availability during scale events.
- Budget-aware policies: Set minimum floors for critical workloads, and cost ceilings by environment (dev/test vs. prod).
Label everything with cost context (team, project, env). This enables accurate showback/chargeback and precise policy scoping:
Practical Playbooks on Sealos
Here are field-tested patterns you can adopt quickly.
Playbook 1: Dev/QA Scale-to-Zero Nights and Weekends
- Apply KEDA cron triggers to all non-prod workloads.
- Set minReplicaCount: 0 and desiredReplicas per work shift.
- Use Sealos’ multi-tenant isolation to restrict who can override schedules.
Impact: 30–60% reduction in non-prod compute spend with minimal developer friction.
Playbook 2: Event-Driven Workers on Spot Nodes
- Create a spot node pool with a taint spot=true:NoSchedule and label lifecycle=spot.
- Deploy KEDA-based consumers with tolerations/affinity for the spot pool.
- Add a fallback buffer on on-demand nodes for SLA sensitivity.
- Tune cooldownPeriod and maxReplicaCount to cap spend.
Impact: Massive cost savings on bursty workloads; no idle baseline.
Playbook 3: Right-Size Services in Production
- Enable VPA with updateMode: “Off” for two weeks to collect recommendations.
- Apply VPA with minAllowed/maxAllowed bounds; switch to updateMode: “Auto”.
- Combine with HPA for replica elasticity and PDBs for safe rollouts.
Impact: 20–40% CPU/memory efficiency gains without service risk.
Playbook 4: E-commerce Flash Sales
- Pre-warm a minimal replica floor before the event.
- Use KEDA triggers from queue length or RPS to scale up rapidly.
- Set Pod topology spread constraints to avoid single-az/node concentration.
- After the event, autoscalers reduce replicas and free nodes for scale-down.
Impact: Handle surges without overpaying for a 24/7 peak baseline.
Playbook 5: Data Pipelines and ETL
- Schedule batch jobs on a spot pool with retries and checkpointing.
- Use KEDA cron triggers to line up capacity just-in-time.
- Snapshots and object storage lifecycle policies to control storage growth.
Impact: Predictable windows of spend; aggressive use of cheaper capacity.
Playbook 6: AI/ML Training and GPU Efficiency
- Use node labels to target GPU nodes; consider NVIDIA time-slicing for partial GPU usage when suitable.
- Batch training on spot where checkpoints tolerate preemption.
- Autoscale inference horizontally; load test to set proper minReplicas.
Impact: Reduce GPU idle time and avoid paying for 24/7 full-GPU allocations.
Measuring Success: KPIs for Autonomous Optimization
Track the outcomes to prove (and sustain) the value:
- Cost efficiency: $/request, $/job, $/GB processed
- Utilization targets: CPU/memory utilization bands by workload class
- Elasticity: Average time to scale up/down, scale-down reclaimed node-hours
- Reliability: Error budgets consumed, SLO adherence under autoscaling
- Coverage: % of workloads under HPA/VPA/KEDA, % on spot vs. on-demand
- Waste reduced: Idle pod hours, orphaned volumes, zombie services eliminated
On Sealos, tie these to namespaces and labels to produce team-level scorecards.
Getting Started on Sealos
You can bring these patterns to life quickly on Sealos:
- Stand up your Sealos cluster
- Deploy Sealos on your preferred infrastructure or use a managed Sealos environment.
- Enable multi-tenancy with teams/namespaces that match your organizational structure.
- Install the optimization building blocks
- Observability: Prometheus, metrics-server.
- Autoscalers: HPA (built-in), VPA operator, KEDA.
- Cluster elasticity: Cluster Autoscaler configured for your provider.
- Policy: OPA/Gatekeeper for enforceable guardrails (optional but recommended).
- Define guardrails
- Namespace ResourceQuotas and LimitRanges.
- PDBs for all HA services.
- Gatekeeper policies to enforce requests/limits and node placement rules.
- Apply playbooks incrementally
- Start with non-prod scale-to-zero.
- Add VPA in recommendation mode; then enable Auto with bounds.
- Introduce spot pools to stateless or idempotent workloads first.
- Label for cost accountability
- Standardize labels across workloads for accurate cost allocation.
- Use these labels in your dashboards and reports.
- Iterate the control loop
- Review KPIs every sprint.
- Tighten bounds, adjust policies, and expand automation coverage.
Sealos’ unified developer experience and app marketplace streamline this entire flow. Explore Sealos at sealos.io to see how it fits into your stack and accelerates your FinOps journey.
Common Pitfalls (and How Sealos Helps You Avoid Them)
- Ignoring PDBs: Without them, aggressive scale-down can cause outages. Bake PDBs into your templates.
- Unbounded VPA: Always set minAllowed/maxAllowed; don’t let a noisy spike override common sense.
- Overusing spot: Keep latency-sensitive or stateful services on on-demand nodes unless you’ve proven resilience.
- Missing labels: No labels, no accountability. Enforce via policy.
- Drifting from defaults: Capture your best practices in Sealos templates for consistent tenant onboarding.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is autonomous optimization risky for production?
It’s risky without guardrails. With PDBs, quotas, and policy enforcement—and by rolling out gradually—automation reduces risk by eliminating manual, ad hoc changes. Sealos makes these guardrails a first-class concept.
Do I need to rewrite my apps?
No. Most benefits come from platform-level features (autoscaling, scheduling, quotas). For event-driven scaling, exposing queue metrics or HTTP rates is usually enough.
Can I still approve changes manually?
Yes. Start with recommendation-only modes (VPA Off), and promote to automated once you’re confident. Sealos supports both workflows.
What if I already use cost tools?
Great. Sealos complements monitoring with action. Use your existing dashboards to observe; use Sealos to enforce and automate.
A Short Example: Putting It Together
Suppose you run an API and a worker service:
-
API:
- HPA scales 2..20 at 60% CPU.
- VPA auto-rightsizes 100m..2 CPU and 128Mi..2Gi memory.
- PDB keeps 80% always available.
- Topology spread across nodes.
-
Worker:
- KEDA scales 0..30 based on Kafka lag.
- Runs on spot nodes with tolerations and preferred affinity.
- PDB ensures safe drain; idempotent processing guarantees correctness.
-
Cluster:
- Cluster Autoscaler scales down in 10 minutes if nodes idle.
- ResourceQuotas keep team usage in check.
- S3 lifecycle expires logs after 365 days, tiers after 30 days.
This setup continuously optimizes spend while keeping SLOs intact—no weekly manual tuning session required.
Conclusion: Beyond Dashboards, Toward a Self-Optimizing Cloud
Monitoring is table stakes. The competitive edge comes from making your platform self-optimizing—measuring, deciding, and acting within the guardrails you define. Sealos provides the Kubernetes-native foundation to do exactly that:
- Right-size, scale elastically, and bin-pack efficiently
- Leverage spot capacity where safe
- Scale to zero for non-prod and idle services
- Automate storage lifecycle hygiene
- Govern everything with quotas, PDBs, and policy
The result is a cloud that adapts to demand and respects budgets automatically, freeing your teams to focus on features—not firefighting waste. Explore Sealos at sealos.io and start turning cost insights into autonomous, trustworthy action.
Explore with AI
Get AI insights on this article